Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Post Frame Snow Load Design and Commentary on ASCE Unbalanced Snow Load Design
2
Todays Topics
  • Discuss Design factors used in IBC snow load design
  • Review the history of ASCE-7 and how its changes have affected unbalanced snow load design.
  • Show where this design standard is moving to in 7-05





3
Michigan Ground Snow Load Map (IBC)
4
MRC Ground Snow Load Map
5
Adjustment Factors
to Obtain Roof Snow Load
  • Pf = .7 * Ce* CT* I * Pground


  • .7 = 70% on roof
  • Ce =  Roof Exposure Factor (.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2)
  • CT = Temperature Factor (1.0, 1.1, 1.2)
  • I = Importance Factor (.8, 1.0, 1.2)
  • Pground= Map values
  • Pf =  flat roof snow load design value
6
Ce = Snow Exposure Factors
7
Sheltered Condition ??
8
CT = Temperature Factor
  • 1.0
  • 1.1
  • 1.2
  • All  except  as indicated below (heated, R< 25)
  • Structures kept above freezing, ventilated  roofs in which the R between the ventilated space and the heated space exceeds 25. (i.e. 12” insulation, R38)
  • Unheated structures
  • (see IBC pp 308- table 1608.3.2)
9
CT = Temperature Factor
  • Ct= 1.2    unheated
  • Ct = 1.1
  •     heated  with attic and   r= 38 insulation in ceiling
10
Building Importance Factor
11
Snow load Comparisons for Unbalanced Loading
12
Cs Factor   -    Ps= Pf* Cs
  • Cs (roof slope) factor is Multiplied  times the Pf (flat roof snow load) and this yields the final design roof snow load (Ps)
  • It is a function of roof insulation and Roof temperature
  • It is favorable to Steel roofs (range=.7- 1.0- generally about~.95 for 3 and 4 /12 roof pitches with cold roofs)
  • Less favorable to shingle roofs( Equal to 1.0 for roof pitches up thru 12/12- 45 degrees cold roofs)
  • Steel roofs with snow guards are to be treated like shingle roofs.
  • This factor becomes smaller with higher roof pitches- thus it reduces the design roof snow load.
13
Cs Factor
14
Graphs for Determining Roof Slope Factor Cs
15
Cs Factor
16
Results of Average Adjustment Factors to Obtain Roof Snow Load
  • Pf = .7 * Ce* CT* I * Pground


  • .7 = 70% on roof
  • Ce =  Roof Exposure Factor (.9, 1.0, 1.1)
  • CT = Temperature Factor (1.0, 1.1, 1.2)
  • I = Importance Factor (.9, 1.0, 1.1)
  • Pground= Map values
  • Pf =  flat roof snow load design value
  • Pf= .7*1.0*1.2*1.0*Pg=   .84*Pg
17
Michigan Ground Snow load Map
18
Other Roof Load Design Considerations
  • Snow Drift
    • Sliding snow
    • Drifting snow
  • Roofing Conditions
    • Steel or shingles
    • Snow guards
19
Snow Drift on Lower Roofs
  • ASCE 7-98 Figure 7-8


20
Drift
21
Snow Drift Areas
22
ASCE- 7 Snow Loads
23
Unbalanced Snow Loads
24
ASCE 7-98 Unbalanced Snow Load Design Requirements
25
ASCE 7-98 (adopted by 2000 IBC)- Cases 1, 2 and 3
26
ASCE 7-98 case 4
27
The 7-98 Unbalanced Design Requirement put Considerable Extra Cost in the Building Design it Affected
  • Footings
  • Possibly columns
  • Sidewall headers
  • Truss to column connections
  • Trusses
  • purlins
28
Foundations Footing Sizes Affected by Unbalanced Roof Loads
29
Truss Design with Balance Snow Load (42 PSF)
30
Truss Design with Unbalanced Snow Load for Same Truss (13/76 PSF)
31
Purlin Design Comparisons with Unbalanced Snow Loads
32
Industry / State Actions
  • In 2003 Wisconsin was one state that understood the ramifications of this extreme change in unbalanced snow load design and adopted an “alternate unbalanced snow load standard”, allowing the use of the Canadian Building Code design procedure.
  • In the meantime ASCE 7-02 was relaxing some of their unbalanced snow load design provisions.
    • These were then adopted by IBC-2003
33
Wisconsin Alternate Standard (adopted 2003)
34
Summary of Unbalanced Reactions



35
Wisconsin Second “Alternate Standard”
  • The current 2003 IBC adopts the use of this same EP-486 for design of Post frame buildings.
36
EP-486 Soil Pressure Increases as Follows
37
Comparison of EP-486 Calculated Values vs. 2000 and 2003 IBC Base Presumptive Values
  • *  5’ H.D with an 18” footing.
38
Footing Requirements Comparisons
39
ASCE 7-02 Unbalanced Snow Load
  • Eliminated case 4
40
ASCE 7-02 Unbalanced Snow Load Design Requirements
41
ASCE 7-02(adopted by 2003 IBC) Cases 1, 2 and 3
42
Summary of Unbalanced Reactions



43
IBC Codes and ASCE -7 Standards
44
Early model of Unbalanced Snow Loads
45
Proposed Draft of ASCE 7-05 on Unbalanced Load Standard
46
ASCE 7-05 Proposed Formulas for Unbalanced Snow Loads
47
ASCE 7-05 (adopted by 2006 IBC ) Cases 1, 2 and 3
48
Summary of Unbalanced Reactions



49
Summary of Unbalanced Reactions



50
ASCE 7-05 Unbalanced Snow Load Provision
  • NFBA supports the 7-05 unbalanced snow load provision.
  • History tells us that buildings designed under ASCE 7-93, 7-95 have shown good performance and 7-02 and 7-05 are moving back toward these results.
51
Thank You